Questions for Jan 10

The readings this week on the Camina Nocturna demonstrate the commonalities between the Mexican and US government objectives in the use of this immigration theme park attraction yet the very different meanings that tourists may take away. This has always been a risk in theatre productions but how dangerous of a risk is it in such an attraction? Most of the comparisons of the Camina Nocturna to other simulations are not solid because most other simulations do not display a current tangible reality. Civil War simulations demonstrate history and Space simulations demonstrate experiences that are quite difficult to attain otherwise. What dangers could come from simulations that demonstrate such a contested reality? Do these risks need to be examined further or should they be left as an performative ambiguity enhancing the experience within the simulation? Additionally, how effective are these simulations in deterring illegal immigration when the roots are arguably from the success of attractions in Las Vegas, where many of the staff has come from? Are the simulations effective enough in creating jobs that immigration will lessen? What are the benefits and costs of the simulations and how should they be handled as the attractions grow and continue?